[openib-general] [PATCH v4 2/7] IB/ipath - Implement new verbs DMA mapping functions
Ralph Campbell
ralph.campbell at qlogic.com
Tue Dec 12 10:22:58 PST 2006
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 10:51 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > I would like to see this last set of patches integrated as is.
> > > I would like to get more experience with the current implementation
> > > before extending it to support other configurations.
> >
> > Yeah, let's go with that. Since ipath depends on 64BIT in Kconfig
> > anyway I think this is OK for now.
>
> This design of ib_dma_map_single, ib_sg_dma_address etc returning u64
> instead of dma_addr_t causes the resulted patch to the IB ULPs to be
> quite big.
I think it was you who pointed out that dma_addr_t is
32 bits on sparc64. Did you have a different solution
in mind?
> Have you tested any dma_map single (eg IPoIB) and sg (eg SRP or iSER)
> consumer with this code?
Yes.
More information about the general
mailing list