[dat-discussions] [openib-general] [RFC] DAT 2.0immediatedataproposal

[Kanevsky, Arkady]

All 3 options: proposed APIs, extensions, or IB semantic API
all provide the same performance benefit on IB.
But the last option is the easiest to use.

Arkady Kanevsky                       email: arkady at netapp.com
Network Appliance Inc.               phone: 781-768-5395
1601 Trapelo Rd. - Suite 16.        Fax: 781-895-1195
Waltham, MA 02451                   central phone: 781-768-5300
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Hefty [mailto:sean.hefty at intel.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:12 AM
> To: Kanevsky, Arkady; Caitlin Bestler; Larsen, Roy K; 
> dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com; Sean Hefty
> Cc: openib-general at openib.org
> Subject: RE: [dat-discussions] [openib-general] [RFC] DAT 
> 2.0immediatedataproposal
> 
> >Why would any Consumer hook itself on "proprietary" features 
> and APIs 
> >is a different question.
> 
> Because it provides a real performance benefit.  This is the 
> same reason apps code to DAPL versus standard sockets.
> 
> - Sean
> 
>