[openib-general] RE: [PATCH] Opensm - cl_event_wheel casting
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Sun Feb 12 05:05:43 PST 2006
Hi Yael,
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 02:56, Yael Kalka wrote:
> Hi Hal,
> I am not sure it really matters, as the timeout used will be of uint32_t size
> anyways.
Then why check and warn about an overflow in the clause right above it ?
A max 32 bit timeout would be pretty long (slightly more than 4294
seconds).
> If you think using the max 32 bit makes more sense - I am fine with that too.
I will change it for this case which likely wouldn't be hit.
-- Hal
> Yael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:halr at voltaire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 5:29 PM
> To: Yael Kalka
> Cc: openib-general at openib.org; Eitan Zahavi
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Opensm - cl_event_wheel casting
>
>
> Hi Yael,
>
> On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 03:53, Yael Kalka wrote:
> > Hi Hal,
> >
> > The following patch adds the casting done in a clearer way - to avoid
> > compilation errors in windows. Also - added a clear message if the
> > timeout was trimmed (due to the casting).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yael
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yael Kalka <yael at mellanox.co.il>
> >
> > Index: complib/cl_event_wheel.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- complib/cl_event_wheel.c (revision 5307)
> > +++ complib/cl_event_wheel.c (working copy)
> > @@ -426,8 +426,18 @@ cl_event_wheel_reg(
> > * cl_timer_stop(&p_event_wheel->timer);
> > */
> >
> > + /* The timeout for the cl_timer_start should be given as uint32_t.
> > + if there is an overflow - warn about it. */
> > + if ( timeout > (uint32_t)timeout )
> > + {
> > + osm_log (p_event_wheel->p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
> > + "cl_event_wheel_reg: "
> > + "timeout requested is too large. Using timeout: %u \n",
> > + (uint32_t)timeout );
> > + }
> > +
> > /* start the timer to the timeout [msec] */
> > - cl_status = cl_timer_start(&p_event_wheel->timer, timeout);
> > + cl_status = cl_timer_start(&p_event_wheel->timer, (uint32_t)timeout);
>
> Shouldn't this use the max 32 bit timeout here rather than the low 32
> bits ?
>
> -- Hal
>
> > if (cl_status != CL_SUCCESS)
> > {
> >
More information about the general
mailing list