[openib-general] Re: Re: madvise MADV_DONTFORK/MADV_DOFORK

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Gleb Natapov <glebn at voltaire.com>:
> Subject: Re: Re: madvise MADV_DONTFORK/MADV_DOFORK
> 
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 06:42:36PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > All, MADV_DONTFORK patch is now part of the -mm tree.
> > Everyone who's interested in fork support, please test 2.6.16-rc3-mm1 and
> > publish the results here and on lkml.
> > 
> Good news!
> 
> Should call to madvise be the part of reg_mr call?

Probably no - MPI should have to do it.

-- 
Michael S. Tsirkin
Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies