[openib-general] Need for ONE OpenIB Release process that allmembers can agree to and that follows OpenIB Bylaws

[Bill Boas]

Thank you, James, that's right.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Lentini [mailto:jlentini at netapp.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:19 AM
To: Bob Woodruff
Cc: 'Bill Boas'; openib-promoters at openib.org; openib-general at openib.org
Subject: RE: [openib-general] Need for ONE OpenIB Release process that
allmembers can agree to and that follows OpenIB Bylaws



On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Bob Woodruff wrote:

> >Components that we don't know what to do about, and will likely want to
> drop 
> 
> >unless someone can vouch for them:
> >      * iSER
> >      * SRP
> >      * uDAPL"
> 
> Why would you drop these ? People want all of them.

Bill wasn't proposing to drop these. He was quoting Bryan O'Sullivan's 
original post:

http://openib.org/pipermail/openib-general/2006-February/017019.html

With regards to uDAPL, I think we have established that it should be 
part of the 1.0 release.