[openib-general] Advice
Scott A. Friedman
friedman at ucla.edu
Thu Jan 19 20:55:39 PST 2006
Sean Hefty wrote:
>> 1. What usermode tools should I use if I want to use the modules that
>> are part of the current kernels (e.g. Fedora). The OpenIB subversion
>> code, the IBGD stuff or something else.
>
> Not sure what IBGD is. The OpenIB svn code matches with that shipping in the
> current kernels.
>
Sorry, I mean the Mellanox Gold distribution thing. Using this is kinda
a problem for me since I need to use a recent kernel - to support some
non Infiniband stuff.
Just so I understand. When you say 'svn code matches' it means a) the
kernel modules are the same (or close enough). b) the usermode stuff
will/should work without a problem. Could you be a little more specific?
Just curious how this works until things stabilize more.
>> 2. Is there any reason to *not* use the kernel modules that are now
>> included with the kernel.org or Fedora kernels? If so, which to use?
>
> Several modules in svn are not yet available in the kernel, so it depends on
> what you are trying to do.
>
Mainly, I am interested in the verb layer for know so my needs are not
that great. However, is there a reason to compile and use the svn kernel
modules in place of the supplied ones? Or, as you mentioned above - are
fixes/patches picked up by the distributions in between stable kernel
releases.
>> 3. How stable is the subversion code? Is it just for testers?
>
> In general, the tip of svn gen2/trunk is stable. Bugs are usually fixed within
> a relatively short time (couple of hours to a day). The drawback is that it
> targets the latest kernel release; however, backport patches are available.
>
Hmm, this is what I am looking for so that is actually a good thing for
me. Except for having to rebuild the kernel to use the svn driver code.
I suppose that I could just stick with building the usermode stuff and
use the supplied kernel modules since I am not using any of the missing
stuff.
I also noticed that a person from redhat has provided some rpm modules
of the usermode libraries. Is anyone using these? Is this a reasonable
way to go? I suppose it is just a convenience.
Thanks again,
Scott
More information about the general
mailing list