[openib-general] Re: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels, many svn trees)

[Nishanth Aravamudan]

On 24.01.2006 [01:01:32 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc at us.ibm.com>:
> > Looks like 5162/5163 is fine building wise. Here is what I got for
> > rdma_lat for a 32-bit server and 32-bit client:
> > 
> > loading libehca   local address: LID 0x0d QPN 0x140406 PSN 0x253f3e RKey 0x2340032 VAddr 0x00000010019001
> >   remote address: LID 0x08 QPN 0x140406 PSN 0xa79d77 RKey 0x2340032 VAddr 0x00000010019001
> >   Latency typical: 3.25746e+09 usec
> >   Latency best   : 3.19975e+09 usec
> >   Latency worst  : 4.21767e+10 usec
> > 
> > and for rdma_bw:
> > 
> > loading libehca  local address:  LID 0x0d, QPN 0x150406, PSN 0x1b3ee5 RKey 0x23a0032 VAddr 0x000000f7fce000
> >   remote address: LID 0x08, QPN 0x150406, PSN 0x2fa0a9, RKey 0x23a0032 VAddr 0x000000f7fb8000
> >   Bandwidth peak (#0 to #999): 4.3446e-07 MB/sec
> >   Bandwidth average: 4.3446e-07 MB/sec
> >   Service Demand peak (#0 to #999): 17301 cycles/KB
> >   Service Demand Avg  : 0 cycles/KB
> > 
> > So it's still present...
> > 
> 
> I have just uploaded a simple utility which I called clock_test which
> measures a clock once a second: this way you'll know whether mtfb 
> is measuring time properly.

Will it get built by running make in the perftest directory?

Any special usage I should know about?

Thanks,
Nish