[openib-general] iwarp: whats a pkey?

Troy Benjegerdes hozer at hozed.org
Fri Jan 27 17:45:29 PST 2006


On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:34:48PM -0800, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> openib-general-bounces at openib.org wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 15:32, Roland Dreier wrote:
> >>     Roland> No, I think trying to create a mapping is a bad idea. 
> >>     The Roland> semantics of VLANs and IB partitions are sufficiently
> >>     Roland> different that it's probably better to treat each
> >> concept     Roland> natively. 
> >> 
> >>     Steve> Roland, can you expand on this some?
> >> 
> >> I don't think transport neutral code should be dealing with either
> >> P_Keys or VLANs.  The Linux model for handling VLANs is that each
> >> VLAN has a separate network interface.  So an iWARP consumer should
> >> never deal with VLANs, just with a routing choice of interfaces.
> >> 
> >> Similarly if a consumer is using the iWARP-emulation CM for IB, then
> >> the P_Key will come from the IPoIB interface.  Only native IB
> >> consumers that understand partitions ever have to deal with P_Keys.
> > 
> > What about a gateway between iWARP and IB ? Would it need the
> > mappings between VLAN and IB partition ? If so, I would
> > presume that is at a layer above what you are talking about.
> > 
> 
> If you are attempting to implement an iWARP/IB gateway *above*
> transport neutral verbs then I don't think there is anything
> that can be defined that will be of much help.

The IB side of the gateway should know about P_Keys, but I think
attempting to translate that to vlans is a bad idea. Any use case I can
think of that is going to want to map IB partitions to a vlan will do it
by having the gateway know what P_Key goes to what ethernet interface,
and there are already other tools to map ethernet interfaces to vlans.
Let's not reinvent this until there's an actual need.



More information about the general mailing list