[openib-general] [PATCH] uDAPL openib-cma provider - add support for IB_CM_REQ_OPTIONS

[Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)]

Yes, the modules were loaded.

Each of the 32 hosts had 3 IB ports up.  Does Intel MPI or uDAPL use
multiple ports and/or multiple HCAs?

I shut down all but one port on each host, and now Pallas is running
better on the 32 nodes using Intel MPI 2.0.1.  HP MPI 2.2 started
working too with Pallas too over uDAPL, so maybe this is a uDAPL issue?

I need to repeat the tests to make sure this isn't a fluke.

Thanks for your help so far.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davis, Arlin R [mailto:arlin.r.davis at intel.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:11 PM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen); Arlin Davis
> Cc: Lentini, James; openib-general
> Subject: RE: [openib-general] [PATCH] uDAPL openib-cma 
> provider - add support for IB_CM_REQ_OPTIONS
> 
> Scott,
> 
> Can you take a look and see if rdma_cm and rdma_ucm modules are being
> loaded?
> 
> I noticed on my latest OFED RC5 install that I had to start them
> manually.
> 
> -arlin
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) [mailto:sweitzen at cisco.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 5:08 PM
> >To: Arlin Davis; Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> >Cc: Davis, Arlin R; Lentini, James; openib-general
> >Subject: RE: [openib-general] [PATCH] uDAPL openib-cma provider - add
> support for IB_CM_REQ_OPTIONS
> >
> >
> >> this looks like a configuration issue and not the timeout. The CR
> >> timeouts occured with
> >> the rdma device and not the rdssm.  Is IPoIB running on the ib0
> >> interfaces across the
> >> fabric?
> >
> >Yes, IPoIB is running.
> >
> >Scott
>