[openib-general] RE: Failed multicast join withnew multicast module
Greg Lindahl
greg.lindahl at qlogic.com
Thu Jun 8 11:18:09 PDT 2006
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:49:35AM -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
> What if we started with something like the following compliance statement, and
> tried to add this to the spec?
>
> An SM, upon becoming the master, shall respect all existing communication in the
> fabric, where possible.
Isn't this a quality of implementation issue? It's hard to imagine a
SM author not realizing this is a good thing to do.
If it was in the standard, how would you test it for compliance?
-- g
More information about the general
mailing list