[openib-general] [PATCH] osm: fix num of blocks of GUIDInfo GetTable query

[Eitan Zahavi]

Auuuch it is there! 
My mistake. Sp please apply the patch to the OFED 1.0 branch too.
BTW: Is the osmtest -f a excersizes this query on the OFED 1.0 ?

> Huh ? What's
>
https://openfabrics.org/svn/gen2/branches/1.0/src/userspace/management/o
sm/opens
> m/osm_sa_guidinfo_record.c
> 
> -- Hal
> 
> >
> > Eitan Zahavi
> > Senior Engineering Director, Software Architect
> > Mellanox Technologies LTD
> > Tel:+972-4-9097208
> > Fax:+972-4-9593245
> > P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:halr at voltaire.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 12:22 AM
> > > To: Eitan Zahavi
> > > Cc: OPENIB
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] osm: fix num of blocks of GUIDInfo GetTable
query
> > >
> > > Eitan,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 07:24, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> > > > Hi Hal
> > > >
> > > > I'm working on passing osmtest check. Found a bug in the new
> > > > GUIDInfoRecord query: If you had a physical port with zero
guid_cap
> > > > the code would loop on blocks 0..255 instead of trying the next
> > port.
> > > >
> > > > I am still looking for why we might have a guid_cap == 0 on some
> > > > ports.
> > > >
> > > > This patch resolves this new problem. osmtest passes on some
> > arbitrary
> > > > networks.
> > > >
> > > > Eitan
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by:  Eitan Zahavi <eitan at mellanox.co.il>
> > >
> > > Thanks. Applied to trunk only.
> > >
> > > Let me know if it also should be applied to 1.0.
> > >
> > > -- Hal