[openib-general] design for communication established affiliated asynchronous event handling

[Or Gerlitz]

On 6/16/06, Sean Hefty <sean.hefty at intel.com> wrote:
>>The cma/verbs consumer can't just ignore the event since its qp state is
>>still RTR which means an attempt to tx replying the rx would fail.

> In most cases, I would expect that the IB CM will eventually receive the RTU,
> which will generate an event to the RDMA CM to transition the QP into RTS.

But we want an IB stack and set of ULPs which would work in production so they
need to handle also irregular cases... eg when the RTU is lost over and over.

Or