[openib-general] design for communication established affiliated asynchronous event handling

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 11:15, James Lentini wrote:

[snip...]

> > As an alternative, I don't think that there's any reason why the QP 
> > can't be transition to RTS when the CM REP is sent.  
> 
> I like this idea. It simplifies how ULPs handle this issue. Are there 
> any spec. compliance issues with this?

IMO, it would violate the CM state machine and the passive CM transition
specification in 12.9.7.2 and have the effect of circumventing the
retransmission of REP on lost RTU. Data can't fly until either the RTU
or the first data message is received from the other direction.

-- Hal