[openib-general] [PATCHv3] osm: partition manager force policy

Eitan Zahavi eitan at mellanox.co.il
Mon Jun 19 08:24:40 PDT 2006


Hi Sasha,

Thanks. This is yet another bug.
The fix is trivial and is noted below.

Please let me know when you are done reviewing and I will post a new patch.

EZ
Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 14:46 Sun 18 Jun     , Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> 
>>Another one is the handling of switch limited partition cap by
>>clearing the switch enforcement bit (on the specific port).
> 
> 
> Some comment about this too. See below.
> 
> 
>>+ib_api_status_t
>>+osm_pkey_tbl_set_new_entry( 
>>+	IN osm_pkey_tbl_t *p_pkey_tbl,
>>+	IN uint16_t        block_idx,
>>+	IN uint8_t         pkey_idx,
>>+	IN uint16_t        pkey)
>>+{  
>>+	ib_pkey_table_t *p_old_block;
>>+	ib_pkey_table_t *p_new_block;
>>+	
>>+	if (osm_pkey_tbl_make_block_pair(
>>+			 p_pkey_tbl, block_idx, &p_old_block, &p_new_block))
>>+		return( IB_ERROR );
>>+		
>>+	p_new_block->pkey_entry[pkey_idx] = pkey;
>>+	if (p_pkey_tbl->used_blocks < block_idx)
>>+		p_pkey_tbl->used_blocks = block_idx;
Fix:
	if (p_pkey_tbl->used_blocks <= block_idx)
		p_pkey_tbl->used_blocks = block_idx + 1;
>>+
>>+	return( IB_SUCCESS );
>>+}
> 
> 
> p_pkey_tbl->used_blocks is updated as block index in range 0,1,2....
> 
> 
>>@@ -242,10 +421,26 @@ pkey_mgr_update_peer_port(
>>    if (!p_sw || !(p_si = osm_switch_get_si_ptr( p_sw )) || !p_si->enforce_cap)
>>       return FALSE;
>> 
>>+	p_pkey_tbl = osm_physp_get_pkey_tbl( p_physp );
>>+	p_peer_pkey_tbl = osm_physp_get_mod_pkey_tbl( peer );
>>+	num_of_blocks = osm_pkey_tbl_get_num_blocks( p_pkey_tbl );
>>+	peer_max_blocks = pkey_mgr_get_physp_max_blocks( p_subn, peer );
>>+	if (peer_max_blocks < p_pkey_tbl->used_blocks)
>>+	{
> 
> 
> But compared with total number of blocks (ranged 1,2,3,...). In case
> where switch supports N pkey blocks and CA - N+1, switch's ports will be
> updated and partitioning enforced.
> 
> Sasha
> 
> 
>>+		osm_log( p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR,
>>+					"pkey_mgr_update_peer_port: ERR 0508: "
>>+					"not enough entries (%u < %u) on switch 0x%016" PRIx64
>>+					" port %u. Clearing Enforcement bit.\n",
>>+					peer_max_blocks, num_of_blocks,
>>+					cl_ntoh64( osm_node_get_node_guid( p_node ) ),
>>+					osm_physp_get_port_num( peer ) );
>>+		enforce = FALSE;
>>+	}
>>+
> 
> 





More information about the general mailing list