[openib-general] CM and REP handling

[Sean Hefty]

Rimmer, Todd wrote:
> Shouldn't the cm_dup_req_handler in this case also resend the REP per
> the IBTA passive side state machine "REP Sent" state?

The REP will already being retried based on a timeout.  It could be resent 
immediately in response to a duplicate REQ as well, but that shouldn't be 
necessary, and actually makes things more complex, since coordination must be 
done between sending based on a timeout, versus receiving a duplicate REQ.

- Sean