[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] mad: add GID/class checking for matching received to sent MADs

[Sean Hefty]

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I think we return 1 here since the TID check performed earlier is sufficient
> in this case since its locally unique.
> As I said, same_gid might not be the best name for this function, but the
> logic overall looks right to me.

Isn't a user permitted to re-use the same TID when sending out different GIDs? 
I think that the function name is fine, I'm just not sure about the check being 
completely correct.  (It's more correct than what was there before, so the 
changes have been committed.)

- Sean