[openib-general] CMA stuff
Roland Dreier
rdreier at cisco.com
Thu Mar 2 13:25:08 PST 2006
Sean> I haven't received any feedback. I was waiting for 2.6.17
Sean> to open up before pinging the kernel mail list again. I
Sean> think that the changes between the upstream submission and
Sean> svn include a few modifications to support iWarp better and
Sean> use of the local SA cache.
It's better to discuss it before 2.6.17 opens up -- the merge window
is short, with the expectation that things are settled in advance.
Can we merge a version without the local SA cache first? It would be
better to have the CMA be as small and easy to digest as possible, and
I think the local SA is a completely different discussion.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list