[openib-general] IPOIB_NUM_WC question
Shirley Ma
xma at us.ibm.com
Mon Mar 6 19:43:31 PST 2006
Hello, Roland,
I have a question about below code. Why IPOIB_NUM_WC was set to 4 by
default? If there is no particular reason, I would like to submit a patch
to make this value tunable.
I found some interesting result on different drivers when making this
number tunable. In some case, netperf could even get up to 30% throughout
on ehca, but mthca only gets around 2%. I can post a patch and test result
if you are interested.
Also I noticed that mthca sends IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP with completion entry==0
pretty often, in my netperf test, more than 30% time.
void ipoib_ib_completion(struct ib_cq *cq, void *dev_ptr)
{
struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *) dev_ptr;
struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
int n, i;
ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP);
do {
n = ib_poll_cq(cq, IPOIB_NUM_WC, priv->ibwc);
for (i = 0; i < n; ++i)
ipoib_ib_handle_wc(dev, priv->ibwc + i);
} while (n == IPOIB_NUM_WC);
}
Thanks
Shirley Ma
IBM Linux Technology Center
15300 SW Koll Parkway
Beaverton, OR 97006-6063
Phone(Fax): (503) 578-7638
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20060306/8a32853e/attachment.html>
More information about the general
mailing list