[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure

[Roland Dreier]

    Sam> Eventually - yes.  But not just now. Kbuild was introduced
    Sam> because it was needed in the top-level directory and it made
    Sam> good sense to do so.  But for now keeping Makefile is a good
    Sam> choice. This is anyway what people are used to.

OK, disregard my suggestion then.  Should we patch
Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt to correct the current
documentation, which says:

  The preferred name for the kbuild files is 'Kbuild' but 'Makefile'
  will continue to be supported. All new developmen is expected to use
  the Kbuild filename.

 - R.