[openib-general] [PATCH 2/3] CMA Changes and iWARP CM
Sean Hefty
mshefty at ichips.intel.com
Fri Mar 10 15:30:39 PST 2006
> +static int iw_conn_req_handler(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id,
> + struct iw_cm_event *iw_event)
> +{
> + struct rdma_cm_id* new_cm_id;
> + struct rdma_id_private *listen_id, *conn_id;
> + struct sockaddr_in* sin;
> + int ret;
> +
> + listen_id = cm_id->context;
> + atomic_inc(&listen_id->dev_remove);
> + if (!cma_comp(listen_id, CMA_LISTEN)) {
> + ret = -ECONNABORTED;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Create a new RDMA id the new IW CM ID */
> + new_cm_id = rdma_create_id(listen_id->id.event_handler,
> + listen_id->id.context,
> + RDMA_PS_TCP);
> + if (!new_cm_id) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + conn_id = container_of(new_cm_id, struct rdma_id_private, id);
> + atomic_inc(&conn_id->dev_remove);
> + conn_id->state = CMA_CONNECT;
> +
> + /* New connection inherits device and address from parent */
> + memcpy(&new_cm_id->route.addr.dev_addr,
> + &listen_id->id.route.addr.dev_addr,
> + sizeof(new_cm_id->route.addr.dev_addr));
> + /* New connection inherits device from parent */
> + ret = cma_acquire_dev(conn_id);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
We need some additional cleanup here before jumping to out:
cma_release_remove(conn_id);
rdma_destroy_id(&conn_id->id);
> +
> + conn_id->cm_id.iw = cm_id;
> + cm_id->context = conn_id;
> + cm_id->cm_handler = cma_iw_handler;
> +
> + sin = (struct sockaddr_in*)&new_cm_id->route.addr.src_addr;
> + *sin = iw_event->local_addr;
> +
> + sin = (struct sockaddr_in*)&new_cm_id->route.addr.dst_addr;
> + *sin = iw_event->remote_addr;
> +
> + ret = cma_notify_user(conn_id, RDMA_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_REQUEST, 0,
> + iw_event->private_data,
> + iw_event->private_data_len);
> + if (ret) {
> + /* Destroy the CM ID by returning a non-zero value. */
> + conn_id->cm_id.iw = NULL;
> + cma_exch(conn_id, CMA_DESTROYING);
> + cma_release_remove(conn_id);
> + rdma_destroy_id(&conn_id->id);
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + cma_release_remove(listen_id);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
{snip]
> +static int cma_connect_iw(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
> + struct rdma_conn_param *conn_param)
> +{
> + struct iw_cm_id* cm_id;
> + struct sockaddr_in* sin;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cm_id = iw_create_cm_id(id_priv->id.device, cma_iw_handler, id_priv);
> + if (IS_ERR(cm_id)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(cm_id);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + id_priv->cm_id.iw = cm_id;
> +
> + sin = (struct sockaddr_in*)&id_priv->id.route.addr.src_addr;
> + cm_id->local_addr = *sin;
> +
> + sin = (struct sockaddr_in*)&id_priv->id.route.addr.dst_addr;
> + cm_id->remote_addr = *sin;
> +
> + cm_id->qp = id_priv->id.qp;
> + cm_id->qp_num = id_priv->qp_num;
It still looks unnatural for the client who creates the cm_id to need to set the
local_addr, remote_addr, qp, and qp_num in the cm_id files. I think that these
should be parameters into iw_cm_connect() if the lower layer needs them.
{snip}
> + case RDMA_TRANSPORT_IWARP:
> + id_priv->cm_id.iw->qp = id_priv->id.qp;
> + id_priv->cm_id.iw->qp_num = id_priv->qp_num;
> +
> + ret = iw_cm_accept(id_priv->cm_id.iw, conn_param->private_data,
> + conn_param->private_data_len);
Same comment as previous.
- Sean
More information about the general
mailing list