[openib-general] Please give 1.0 RC1 a whirl

[Moni Levy]

On 3/13/06, James Lentini <jlentini at netapp.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 20:56, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 17:45 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > > > Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > > > >         libibat
> > > > >         libibat-debuginfo
> > > > >         libibat-devel
> > > > >         libibat-utils
> > > >
> > > > The kernel modules to support these are obsolete.  We should
> > > > remove them from the release.
> > >
> > > Fine by me :-)  Are we killing off the kernel code, too, in
> > > parallel?
> >
> > I'm still waiting to hear all consumers have moved to addr/CMA.
>
> The kDAPL OpenIB provider still uses IBAT.
>
> I'd like to see a copy of this code available from OpenIB, but it does
> not have to be on the trunk. For my purposes a copy in
>
> https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/shaharf-ibat
>
> would be acceptable.

Do you plan to continue using this code ?

> Any chance that this branch's at.c and at_priv.h
> could be updated to match the versions on the trunk?
>
> I don't know the state of the shaharf-ibat branch.

The shaharf-ibat branch was not maintained.

>If the current IBAT
> code wouldn't be consistent with that branch, I don't mind keeping the
> current IBAT code at
>
> https://openib.org/svn/gen2/users/jlentini/ibat
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>