[openib-general] Please give 1.0 RC1 a whirl

[Hal Rosenstock]

Hi James,

On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 13:51, James Lentini wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 20:56, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 17:45 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > > > Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > > > >         libibat
> > > > >         libibat-debuginfo
> > > > >         libibat-devel
> > > > >         libibat-utils
> > > > 
> > > > The kernel modules to support these are obsolete.  We should 
> > > > remove them from the release.
> > > 
> > > Fine by me :-)  Are we killing off the kernel code, too, in 
> > > parallel?
> > 
> > I'm still waiting to hear all consumers have moved to addr/CMA.
> 
> The kDAPL OpenIB provider still uses IBAT. 
> 
> I'd like to see a copy of this code available from OpenIB, but it does 
> not have to be on the trunk. For my purposes a copy in 
> 
> https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/shaharf-ibat

This version is older than the one on the trunk.

> would be acceptable. Any chance that this branch's at.c and at_priv.h 
> could be updated to match the versions on the trunk? 
> 
> I don't know the state of the shaharf-ibat branch. If the current IBAT 
> code wouldn't be consistent with that branch, I don't mind keeping the 
> current IBAT code at 
> 
> https://openib.org/svn/gen2/users/jlentini/ibat

Just the kernel portion or both kernel and user space support ?

-- Hal