[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 4/6 v2] IB: address translation to map IP toIB addresses (GIDs)

[Roland Dreier]

    Sean> "This is simply an attempt to reduce/combine work queues
    Sean> used by the Infiniband code.  This keeps the threading a
    Sean> little simpler in the rdma_cm, since all callbacks are
    Sean> invoked using the same work queue.  (I'm also using this
    Sean> with the local SA/multicast code, but that's not ready for
    Sean> merging.)"

How does it keep the threading model simpler?  Is this an inter-module
dependency.

    Sean> There's no specific ordering constraint that's required.
    Sean> We're just ending up with several Infiniband modules
    Sean> creating their own work queues (ib_mad, ib_cm, ib_addr,
    Sean> rdma_cm, plus a couple more in modules under development),
    Sean> and this is an attempt to reduce that.  If having separate
    Sean> work queues would work better, there shouldn't be anything
    Sean> that prevents this.

It seems like it would be cleaner for each module to have its own
workqueue if it needs one.  There's also schedule_work(), although
that goes to a multi-threaded workqueue.  Michael Tsirkin has
suggested creating a system-wide single-threaded workqueue (ie
something like schedule_ordered_work()) for everyone that occasionally
needs a single-threaded workqueue.

 - R.