[openib-general] [RFC] AT and user AT
    Hal Rosenstock 
    halr at voltaire.com
       
    Mon May  1 10:22:33 PDT 2006
    
    
  
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:00, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> As AT and user AT have been obsoleted (and superceeded by CMA which is
> now in the process of going upstream), any objections to removing AT and
> user AT from the trunk ? If I don't hear back by COB Friday, I will
> presume this is OK.
This is now done. AT and user AT are gone from the trunk.
-- Hal
    
    
More information about the general
mailing list