[openib-general] CMA: compliancy issue?

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz at voltaire.com>:
> You are suggesting a design change in the CMA which would effect also 
> the current CMA ULP consumers: iSER, RDS, NFSoRDMA and Lustre.

I don't see how it will affect these ULPs: don't see how ULPs that don't check
private data care whether RTU is sent before, or after, the handler.

In any case, CMA is still in early stages of development so its natural to
expect API changes.


-- 
MST