[openib-general] Re: CMA: compliancy issue?

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Sean Hefty <mshefty at ichips.intel.com>:
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: CMA: compliancy issue?
> 
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >I actually think all we have to do is to change CMA behaviour on REP:
> >send RTU after, and not before, calling user handler.
> >Since other ULPs don't seem t care when RTU is sent, they will continue
> >working.
> 
> I think that it makes more sense to give the user the CONNECT_RESPONSE 
> event, and have them call rdma_accept() or rdma_reject(), versus allowing 
> them to call rdma_reject() after an ESTABLISHED event.  There is already 
> code for this; it's just tied to the existence of a QP off the rdma_cm_id.

OK, that's fine too. BTW I don't think SDP needs to see the RTU
on the active side.


-- 
MST