[openib-general] Re: CMA: compliancy issue?

[Sean Hefty]

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>From iSER point of view, this approach is fine, and it would allow for
>>some future flexibility to reject the REP. We prefer to implement it
>>only for 2.6.19, that is when 2.6.18-rc1 is out.
> 
> 
> Let us start by implementing this in SVN trunk. Sean, if you agree too, can you
> do this?

I'm not sure that always exposing CONNECT_RESPONSE makes sense.  This is slowly 
turning the RDMA CM into the IB CM.  CONNECT_RESPONSE is really there to support 
userspace, and is IB protocol specific.

- Sean