[openib-general][patch review] srp: fmr implementation,

[Tom Tucker]

On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 08:53 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Thomas> I am planning to test this some more in the next few
>     Thomas> weeks, but what I'd really like to see is an IBTA
>     Thomas> 1.2-compliant implementation, and one that operated on
>     Thomas> work queue entries (not synchronous verbs). Is that being
>     Thomas> worked on?
> 
> No current hardware supports that as far as I know.  (Well, ipath
> could fake it since they already implement all the verbs in software)
> 

I'm almost certain I'll be shot for saying this, but isn't there a
danger of confusion with real FMRs when the HW shows up? If the benefit
isn't there -- why do it if the application outcomes are almost
certainly all bad?


>  - R.
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general