[openib-general] Re: rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

[Tom Tucker]

On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 12:22 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > In that case, how about we change rdma_disconnect for IB to do reject if
> > connection isn't established yet?
> 
> Unless I missed something, the only problem that we're trying to solve is that 
> SDP needs to be able to reject a connection based on private data in the REP, 
> but wants the RDMA CM manage its QP states.  The patch that I posted should 
> allow this.
> 
> I don't see the motivation to change the general behavior of the RDMA CM beyond 
> that.  My personal take on private data is that it is application data that 
> could be transferred over the connection, with fewer restrictions and greater 
> reliability.
> 
I agree.
> - Sean