[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] OpenSM: Use memory routines directly and eliminate cl_mem* routines

Hal Rosenstock halr at voltaire.com
Thu May 18 04:37:29 PDT 2006


On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 18:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> > Right now, there is memory
> > tracking code implemented.
> 
> Doesn't MALLOC_CHECK_ do what you want?

Yes, this looks good to me. Just a few questions:

Is this in all glibc's that we would care about ?

I'm also not sure about the Windows implications here. Maybe Eitan can
comment.

-- Hal




More information about the general mailing list