[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] OpenSM: Use memory routines directly and eliminate cl_mem* routines

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 07:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSM: Use memory routines directly and eliminate cl_mem* routines
> > 
> > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 18:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> > > > Right now, there is memory
> > > > tracking code implemented.
> > > 
> > > Doesn't MALLOC_CHECK_ do what you want?
> > 
> > Yes, this looks good to me. Just a few questions:
> > 
> > Is this in all glibc's that we would care about ?
> 
> I think it's been there since the dawn of time :)
> 
> > I'm also not sure about the Windows implications here. Maybe Eitan can
> > comment.
> 
> MSDN says:
> 
> "When the application is linked with a debug version of the C run-time
> libraries, malloc resolves to _malloc_dbg. For more information about how the
> heap is managed during the debugging process, see Using C Run-Time Library
> Debugging Support."

Sounds good to me.

So any final objections to eliminating cl_malloc/free and all the memory
tracking code in OpenSM ? Speak now...

-- Hal