[openib-general] [PATCH 2/3] SA: add call to initialize ib_ah_attr from a path record

Hal Rosenstock halr at voltaire.com
Fri May 19 09:15:29 PDT 2006


On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 12:05, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:19:50AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> 
> > > I think it is also prudent to not use a GRH if the DGID's prefix is
> > > fe80::/64 (link local scope).
> > 
> > Agreed. This saves on the overhead in the local subnet case.
> > 
> > However, wouldn't the HopLimit returned from the SA in this case be 0 or
> > 1 so why would that check be needed ?
> > 
> > If it is, I think the DGID prefix checking may be more than just this.
>  
> I think the SA should work like you are describing, but how sure are
> we that all existing ones do? I'm only suggesting it in case there are
> some broken SA's out there.

Are you aware of any currently that don't ?

In this case, IMO the penalty of including the GRH should be paid (until
those SMs are fixed) rather than adding any additional prefix checking
into the end node.

-- Hal




More information about the general mailing list