[openib-general] Re: Plans for libibverbs 1.1

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Roland Dreier <rdreier at cisco.com>:
> Subject: Re: Plans for libibverbs 1.1
> 
>     Michael> What is meant by canonical repository? I assume
>     Michael> development will be done in git and svn will track some
>     Michael> git tree since early tasters seem to like it.
> 
> Yeah, I guess that could work.  But it doesn't really address the
> issue of where to put libibverbs 1.0 vs. 1.1 in svn.

Right.

> (And I'm not
> sure git-svn can be used to keep two svn trees in sync from the same
> git repository -- can it?)

Assuming development is done in git, won't we just have two git trees - for 1.0
and for 1.1?

-- 
MST