[openib-general] [IPoIB] executing iperf over IPoIB causes to multicast (IP) packets to be recieved out-of-order

Hal Rosenstock halr at voltaire.com
Wed May 24 08:59:15 PDT 2006


On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 11:51, Dotan Barak wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> when executing iperf over IPoIB with multicast IP packets, there are some packets that being received out of order.

With IPmc, there is no ordering guarantee. I'm not sure what your
network configuration is exactly and whether this could be related or
whether a dropped packet is being reported as out of order.

-- Hal

> Here are my machine attributes:
> *************************************************************
> Host Architecture : x86_64
> Linux Distribution: Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz)
> Kernel Version    : 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4smp
> Memory size       : 4071672 kB
> Driver Version    : openib_gen2-20060524-1700 (REV=7460)
> HCA ID(s)         : mthca0
> HCA model(s)      : 25208
> FW version(s)     : 4.7.600
> Board(s)          : MT_00A0010001
> *************************************************************
> 
> here are the iperf command line:
> sender command:    ./iperf -c 10.4.3.86 -u -T 3 -t 400 -i 2 -b 1000M -l 100
> receiver command: ./iperf -s -u -B 10.4.3.86 -i 2
> 
> here is the output of the receiver execution:
> 
> Execute the receiver over IPoIB
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Server listening on UDP port 5001
> Binding to local address 11.4.3.86
> Receiving 1470 byte datagrams
> UDP buffer size:  132 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [  3] local 11.4.3.86 port 5001 connected with 11.4.3.87 port 33334
> [ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter   Lost/Total Datagrams
> [  3]  0.0- 2.0 sec  34.3 MBytes   144 Mbits/sec  0.003 ms  232/359959 (0.064%)
> [  3]  0.0- 2.0 sec  45 datagrams received out-of-order
> [  3]  2.0- 4.0 sec  34.3 MBytes   144 Mbits/sec  0.004 ms    0/359391 (0%)
> [  3]  2.0- 4.0 sec  43 datagrams received out-of-order
> [  3]  4.0- 6.0 sec  34.3 MBytes   144 Mbits/sec  0.003 ms    0/359470 (0%)
> [  3]  4.0- 6.0 sec  31 datagrams received out-of-order
> [  3]  6.0- 8.0 sec  34.3 MBytes   144 Mbits/sec  0.003 ms    0/359195 (0%)
> [  3]  6.0- 8.0 sec  38 datagrams received out-of-order
> [  3]  8.0-10.0 sec  34.3 MBytes   144 Mbits/sec  0.003 ms    0/359379 (0%)
> [  3]  8.0-10.0 sec  48 datagrams received out-of-order
> Waiting for server threads to complete. Interrupt again to force quit.
> [  3]  0.0-21.2 sec   364 MBytes   144 Mbits/sec  0.005 ms  232/3813508 (0.0061%)
> [  3]  0.0-21.2 sec  595 datagrams received out-of-order
> 
> Execute the receiver over IP
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Server listening on UDP port 5001
> Binding to local address 10.4.3.86
> Receiving 1470 byte datagrams
> UDP buffer size:  132 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [  3] local 10.4.3.86 port 5001 connected with 10.4.3.87 port 33334
> [ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter   Lost/Total Datagrams
> [  3]  0.0- 2.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.034 ms  355/150976 (0.24%)
> [  3]  2.0- 4.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.010 ms    0/150599 (0%)
> [  3]  4.0- 6.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.012 ms    0/150597 (0%)
> [  3]  6.0- 8.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.011 ms    0/150599 (0%)
> [  3]  8.0-10.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.009 ms    0/150598 (0%)
> [  3] 10.0-12.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.010 ms    0/150584 (0%)
> [  3] 12.0-14.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.009 ms    0/150583 (0%)
> [  3] 14.0-16.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.019 ms    0/150601 (0%)
> [  3] 16.0-18.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.009 ms    0/150576 (0%)
> [  3] 18.0-20.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.021 ms    0/150583 (0%)
> [  3] 20.0-22.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.010 ms    0/150591 (0%)
> Waiting for server threads to complete. Interrupt again to force quit.
> [  3] 22.0-24.0 sec  14.4 MBytes  60.2 Mbits/sec  0.028 ms    0/150582 (0%)
> 
> 
> did anyone notice this issue before?
> 
> thanks
> Dotan
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general




More information about the general mailing list