[openfabrics-ewg] Re: [openib-general] OpenSM segmentation fault on RC5
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Sat May 27 03:08:35 PDT 2006
Hi Paul,
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 02:26, Paul wrote:
> Hi Hal,
> My lab is undergoing maitanence this weekend so I wont be able
> to get you any results til tuesday, however the results are readily
> reproducable. Everything is 64bit.
Unfortunately I don't have access to a PPC64 machine on which to do this
myself. I wish I did. So can you help next week ? Thanks.
-- Hal
> Regards.
>
> On 26 May 2006 12:46:01 -0400, Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>
> wrote:
> Hi again Paul,
>
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 12:14, Paul wrote:
> > No, I figured all of that out, ppc64 was not
> supported/working in RC4.
> > Either way, here is what I see with opensm:
> >
> > [root at something ~]# /etc/init.d/opensmd start
> > *** glibc detected *** realloc(): invalid next size:
> > 0x00000000100ab1e0 ***
> > /etc/init.d/opensmd: line 330: 7854 Done echo $PORT_FLAG
> > 7855 Aborted | $prog $START_FLAGS >/dev/null 2>&1
> > opensm start [FAILED]
> > [root at something ~]#
>
> OK; that's a totally different problem than Don's. I would
> like to get
> to the bottom of this.
>
> 0x100ab1e0 is a pretty big size. Is this reproducible ?
>
> I'm not sure how realloc gets called as I do not believe
> OpenSM calls it
> directly (or any of its libraries).
>
> Are you using 32 or 64 bit libraries for this ?
>
> Would you rebuild OpenSM with debug:
> ./configure --enable-debug && make clean && make && make
> install
>
> and then run opensm under gdb and provide the backtrace after
> the
> failure?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Hal
>
>
More information about the general
mailing list