[openib-general] Re: QoS RFC

[Roland Dreier]

 > Service-ID:
 > * For PathRecord: use the first 2 reserved fields whicg are 32bits each 
 >   (component masks 0x1 and 0x2). Component mask 1 should be used to
 > refer to the 
 >   merged Service-ID field
 
 > A new capability bit should describe the SM QoS support in the SA class
 > port 
 > info. This approach provides an easy migration path for existing access
 > layer 
 > and ULPs by not introducing a new attribute.

This is OK but it's sort of a pain to have to query SA ClassPortInfo
all the time.  Do you have a plan for how to make this transparent to ULPs?

(BTW something in your email client is really messing up the
formatting of your message)

 - R.