[openib-general] [PATCH] IB/ucm: fix deadlock in cleanup
Sean Hefty
mshefty at ichips.intel.com
Thu Nov 16 07:28:18 PST 2006
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> ib_ucm_cleanup_events has file_mutex while calling ib_destroy_cm_id.
> It seems this can deadlock since ib_destroy_cm_id flushes event
> handlers, and ib_ucm_event_handler needs file_mutex, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at mellanox.co.il>
>
> ---
>
> I'll be testing the following the next night - but it seems a right
> thing to do regardless of whether it fixes the issues I reported
> earlier. Sean, does this make sense to you? If yes, please ack for 2.6.19.
Yes - this looks right to me.
Acked-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty at intel.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucm.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucm.c
> index ad4f4d5..0128288 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucm.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucm.c
> @@ -161,12 +161,14 @@ static void ib_ucm_cleanup_events(struct
> struct ib_ucm_event, ctx_list);
> list_del(&uevent->file_list);
> list_del(&uevent->ctx_list);
> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->file->file_mutex);
>
> /* clear incoming connections. */
> if (ib_ucm_new_cm_id(uevent->resp.event))
> ib_destroy_cm_id(uevent->cm_id);
>
> kfree(uevent);
> + mutex_lock(&ctx->file->file_mutex);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&ctx->file->file_mutex);
> }
>
>
>
More information about the general
mailing list