[openib-general] rdma_cm branch

[Steve Wise]

> Since the ucma will not make it for the 2.6.19 feature merge window, why 
> not target both the ucma and the cma ud/ud-mulitast support for 2.6.20?
> 
> This way you would be doing one big ABI change and would not carry this 
> HUGE svn/git diff.
> 
> As I have mentioned in the other thread, once it would make sense from 
> your schedule to do the patch preparation work, it would be good to push 
> it into the for-2.6.20 branch of Roland's tree from where it can go to 
> the -mm tree so people can start testing it.
> 

This sounds good to me too.