[openib-general] Tools for development

[Jeff Squyres]

I was not on the call last week, but I understand that there was some  
discussion about exactly this point (ditch SVN and go 100% git): the  
decision was to stick with SVN for userspace stuff and stick with git  
for kernel stuff.

However, this is a larger audience than was on the call.  Is there a  
significant movement here from the developers to move to 100% git?

(I don't really care)


On Oct 17, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:

> On 17:04 Tue 17 Oct     , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Quoting r. Steve Wise <swise at opengridcomputing.com>:
>>> At the risk of opening a can of worms, is there any reason we  
>>> don't move
>>> the user stuff into its own git tree?  This would get rid of svn
>>> altogether...
>>
>> If we do, that should probably be multiple git trees - verbs,  
>> management,
>> tests are all more or less independent and developed mostly by  
>> different people.
>
> Reasonable. And generally this should not be too bad.
>
> Sasha
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
> openib-general


-- 
Jeff Squyres
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems