[openib-general] Tools for development

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 08:12 Wed 18 Oct     , Jeff Squyres wrote:
> I was not on the call last week, but I understand that there was some  
> discussion about exactly this point (ditch SVN and go 100% git): the  
> decision was to stick with SVN for userspace stuff and stick with git  
> for kernel stuff.
> 
> However, this is a larger audience than was on the call.  Is there a  
> significant movement here from the developers to move to 100% git?

Moving (or not moving) userspace to git could be done on per project
basis (as actually suggested by Michael).

Personally I'm voting for git.

Sasha

> 
> (I don't really care)
> 
> 
> On Oct 17, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> 
> >On 17:04 Tue 17 Oct     , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>Quoting r. Steve Wise <swise at opengridcomputing.com>:
> >>>At the risk of opening a can of worms, is there any reason we  
> >>>don't move
> >>>the user stuff into its own git tree?  This would get rid of svn
> >>>altogether...
> >>
> >>If we do, that should probably be multiple git trees - verbs,  
> >>management,
> >>tests are all more or less independent and developed mostly by  
> >>different people.
> >
> >Reasonable. And generally this should not be too bad.
> >
> >Sasha
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >openib-general mailing list
> >openib-general at openib.org
> >http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> >
> >To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
> >openib-general
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> Server Virtualization Business Unit
> Cisco Systems
>