[openib-general] RHEL5 and OFED ...
Or Gerlitz
ogerlitz at voltaire.com
Thu Oct 19 02:59:25 PDT 2006
Shirley Ma wrote:
> openib-general-bounces at openib.org wrote on 10/16/2006 01:50:49 PM:
> > On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 15:25 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Quoting r. Maestas, Christopher Daniel <cdmaest at sandia.gov>:
> > > > So I would think rhel5 would have at least that or greater. When I
> > > > compiled rpms for 1.1rc7 it generated:
> > > > ---
> > > > # ls libibverbs-*
> > > > libibverbs-1.0.4-0.x86_64.rpm
> libibverbs-utils-1.0.4-0.x86_64.rpm
> > > > libibverbs-devel-1.0.4-0.x86_64.rpm
> > >
> > > Dough, would it be possible to update this + libmthca?
> >
> > Possibly. What's the justification? What's in 1.0.4 that is the
> > primary reason for wanting to update from 1.0.3?
> I am not sure whether this already has an answer.
> The justification is madvise(..., MADV_DONTFORK) is used to make fork()
> work for verbs consumers in the recent packages. I hope same patch will
> be in libehca.
Just to crlarify: libibverbs-1.X does not include the
madvise(...,MADV_DONTFORK) fork() support, it was integrated into
libibverbs1.1 which is not released yet.
Or.
More information about the general
mailing list