[openib-general] ibstatus support for speed
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Mon Oct 30 14:43:03 PST 2006
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:29, Michael Krause wrote:
> At 02:05 PM 10/30/2006, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Hal> So rate = speed * width ?
> >
> >Yes, you should see the right think on DDR systems etc.
>
> Strange. Bandwidth = signaling rate * width. This of course is raw
> bandwidth prior to encoding, protocol, etc. overheads which will derate the
> effective application bandwidth minimally be 20-25%.
Yes of course. It's just a simple diagnostic to display the width and
speed simply.
> If the goal is
> provide a true indication of the maximum peak bandwidth that an application
> might see,
That's not the goal of this simplistic tool.
> then stating 10 Gbps for an IB x4 SDR is clearly a
> misrepresentation and out of alignment with other networking links such as
> Ethernet which customers understand its bandwidth to be minimally after the
> encoding, etc. is removed from the equation. The perpetual trend by
> marketing to use 10 Gbps IB as equivalent to 10 Gbps of application data is
> actually detrimental not beneficial when it comes to customers. It
> inevitably leads to the question of why the application is not achieving
> the stated bandwidth, i.e. why it is say 700-800MB/s theoretical peak for a
> x4 while a 10 GbE is 1 GB/s peak. So much marketing hype has gone forward
> already. I realize I'm tilting at windmills but if you are to provide a
> tool that is supposed to project the maximum bandwidth possible and given
> the goal of OFA is to provide as much conceptual commonality with existing
> network stacks / links, then it would be beneficial to have this move
> towards a much more apple-to-apple communication of information. I know it
> would certainly help with having to repeatedly explain why IB 10 Gbps is
> not the same as 10 GbE to customers and analysts.
Agreed but this is a different issue from what the tool is for.
IMO this issue largely started when IB decided to use the signalling
rate rather than the data rate like most other networks.
-- Hal
> Mike
>
>
More information about the general
mailing list