[openib-general] [PATCH] osm: PathRecord prefer 1K MTU for MT23108 devices
Eitan Zahavi
eitan at mellanox.co.il
Sat Sep 16 05:19:45 PDT 2006
Hi Shasha, Hal,
I'm back online.
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 20:04, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
>[snip...]
>
>
>>>>>To summarize the functionality change:
>>>>>1. Added enable_quirks option
>>>>>2. If enable_quirks is FALSE do nothing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>I see those quirks are SA specific. Then should this option be called
>>>>'enable_sa_quirks' instead?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Not sure what the right "granularity" is for this. Would all quirks be
>>>enabled at once or would this end up being a pick and choose ?
>>>
>>>
>>Of course this matters how we define this (so I was asking). Right now I
>>see that this is used for SA.
>>
>>
>
>Would there be other SA quirks ? Would there be SM quirks ?
>Are they more hardware related and then tavor_quirks would make more
>sense ?
>
>
Who knows?
>Would all the quirks be enabled together or is it a mix and match ?
>
>
I think that as we currently one only one quirk we can avoid this till
later when we will have a few.
>It's unclear to me which is the best way to go on these aspects.
>
>-- Hal
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>openib-general mailing list
>openib-general at openib.org
>http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
>To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
>
More information about the general
mailing list