[openib-general] [PATCH 2/13] osm: port to WinIB stack : include/opensm/osm_pkey.h
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Mon Sep 18 13:46:58 PDT 2006
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 16:11, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> >Hi Eitan,
> >
> >On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 11:58, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi Hal
> >>
> >>Partition tables blocks are always 16 bits.
> >>This resolves the need to later cast back and forth.
> >>
> >>Thanks
> >>
> >>Eitan
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Eitan Zahavi <eitan at mellanox.co.il>
> >>
> >>Index: include/opensm/osm_pkey.h
> >>===================================================================
> >>--- include/opensm/osm_pkey.h (revision 9502)
> >>+++ include/opensm/osm_pkey.h (working copy)
> >>@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ typedef struct _osm_pkey_tbl
> >> typedef struct _osm_pending_pkey {
> >> cl_list_item_t list_item;
> >> uint16_t pkey;
> >>- uint32_t block;
> >>+ uint16_t block;
> >> uint8_t index;
> >> boolean_t is_new;
> >> } osm_pending_pkey_t;
> >>@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ ib_api_status_t
> >> osm_pkey_tbl_get_block_and_idx(
> >> IN osm_pkey_tbl_t *p_pkey_tbl,
> >> IN uint16_t *p_pkey,
> >>- OUT uint32_t *block_idx,
> >>+ OUT uint16_t *block_idx,
> >> OUT uint8_t *pkey_index);
> >> /*
> >> * p_pkey_tbl
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Doesn't this require at least a similar change to
> >opensm/osm_pkey.c:osm_pkey_tbl_get_block_and_idx ? Anything else ?
> >
> >
> Sure this affects the osm_pkey.c.
> It is included in the mail named: [PATCH 10/13] osm: port to WinIB
> stack : opensm/osm_pkey.c
Each patch should be able to stand on its own (so 2 and 10 should have
been one patch). No need to resubmit for this.
-- Hal
> >-- Hal
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >openib-general mailing list
> >openib-general at openib.org
> >http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> >
> >To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> >
> >
>
More information about the general
mailing list