[ofa-general] [PATCH] OpenSM/osm_port_info_rcv.c: In __osm_pi_rcv_process_endport, isSMdisabled also indicates that an SM is present so poll SMInfo

[Roland Dreier]

 > Good point. At a minimum, the spec is unclear about this (if they are
 > totally separate mechanisms).

When is the spec ever clear? :)

But I think the only interpretation that has a chance at matching the
current spec is to say that IsSMDisabled is not directly related to an
SM in the NOT-ACTIVE state.

Maybe it's worth asking the WG what the motivation for introducing
IsSMDisabled was?

 - R.