[ofa-general] Re: multicast join failed for...
Ira Weiny
weiny2 at llnl.gov
Wed Apr 11 18:30:50 PDT 2007
On 11 Apr 2007 17:45:54 -0400
Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > - previously we had some client failing join
> > which is worse.
>
> Maybe not. Maybe that's what the admin wants (to keep the higher rate
> rather than degrade the group due to some link issue).
>
Indeed, on a big cluster it would be better to have a few nodes dropped out
than to limit the speed of the entire cluster.
Ira
More information about the general
mailing list