[ofa-general] Re: multicast join failed for...
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Fri Apr 13 05:41:41 PDT 2007
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 05:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> > Subject: Re: multicast join failed for...
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 18:47, Egor Tur wrote:
> > > Hi folk.
> > >
> > > > > ib1: multicast join failed for ff12:601b:ffff:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001, status -22
> > > > > ib0: multicast join failed for ff12:601b:ffff:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001, status -22
> > > > >
> > > > > And in osm.log:
> > > > > Apr 09 21:33:50 658439 [42003960] -> __osm_mcmr_rcv_join_mgrp: ERR 1B12: __validate_more_comp_fields,
> > > > > __validate_port_caps, or JoinState = 0 failed from port 0x001708ffffd15099 (HP Lion Cub DDR 128MB),
> > > > > sending IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_REQ_INVALID
> > > > >
> > > > OpenSM ERR 1B12 means that the rate or MTU of the port was incompatible
> > > > with the MC group. You could turn on -V with OpenSM and see more log
> > > > messages as to what is going on wrong from the SM's perspective.
> > >
> > > Ok. This from osm.log with -V :
> > >
> > > Apr 10 00:56:06 390007 [44007960] -> __osm_sa_mad_ctrl_process: [
> > > Apr 10 00:56:06 390016 [44007960] -> __osm_sa_mad_ctrl_process: Posting Dispatcher message OSM_MSG_MAD_MCMEMBER_RECORD
> > > Apr 10 00:56:06 390027 [44007960] -> __osm_sa_mad_ctrl_process: ]
> > > Apr 10 00:56:06 390033 [44007960] -> __osm_sa_mad_ctrl_rcv_callback: ]
> > > Apr 10 00:56:06 390046 [41001960] -> osm_mcmr_rcv_process: [
> > > Apr 10 00:56:06 390054 [41001960] -> __osm_mcmr_rcv_join_mgrp: [
> > > Apr 10 00:56:06 390060 [41001960] -> __osm_mcmr_rcv_join_mgrp: Dump of incoming record
> > > Apr 10 00:56:06 390065 [41001960] -> MCMember Record dump:
> > > MGID....................0xff12601bffff0000 : 0x0000000000000001
> > > PortGid.................0xfe80000000000000 : 0x001708ffffd1509a
> > > qkey....................0xB1B
> > > mlid....................0x0
> > > mtu.....................0x84
> > > TClass..................0x0
> > > pkey....................0xFFFF
> > > rate....................0x83
> > > pkt_life................0x0
> > > SLFlowLabelHopLimit.....0x0
> > > ScopeState..............0x1
> > > ProxyJoin...............0x0
> > > Apr 10 00:56:06 390084 [41001960] -> __validate_more_comp_fields: Requested RATE 6 is not equal to 3
> >
> > Rate 6 is 20 Gb/sec whereas 3 is 10 Gb/sec. So the port is 4x DDR (rate
> > 6) and the group is 4x SDR. The request is for equal to the rate so it
> > fails.
>
>
> BTW, the only reason I know for IPoIB to request a specific rate
> is if the broadcast multicast group has that rate. Roland, is that right?
>
> So, how come the broadcast multicast group has rate DDR, but a specific
> group has lower rate?
Why does this IPoIB client think that the broadcast group is 4x DDR (20
Gbps) when the SM thinks it is 4x SDR (10 Gbps) ? How could that happen
? Is this a porting issue somehow ?
-- Hal
More information about the general
mailing list