[ofa-general] QoS RFC

[Tziporet Koren]

Sean Hefty wrote:
>
> Yes I view QoS as an abstract term, meaning we have a lot of 
> flexibility in how it's defined.  I've chosen to define it wrt the 
> hierarchy above.  Personally, I would drop the SID to QoS mapping, but 
> if it is needed, keep the mapping done on the SA side.
>
> - Sean

Hi Sean,
When do you think that changes to support QoS will be in the CM & CMA?

Tziporet