[ofa-general] QoS RFC

[Sean Hefty]

> I find it more constructive to have a discussion based on a short host 
> side architecture description that covers at least QoS for IPoIB and 
> RDMA CM based ULPs, rather then based on series of patches.

I responded to the original RFC:

http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-July/thread.html

started new threads:

http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-July/038665.html
http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-July/038809.html

It's up to others to provide input.  I have path forward deliverables 
that require actual code.

Adding a service ID to the RDMA CM, or SL/MTU/whatever to IPoIB are 
minor changes.  However, I'm not convinced yet that either are desirable.

- Sean