[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 5/7 V3] osm: QoS - adding QoS policy options

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

> Quoting Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock at gmail.com>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 V3] osm: QoS - adding QoS policy options
> 
> On 8/30/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> > > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock at gmail.com>:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 V3] osm: QoS - adding QoS policy options
> > >
> > > On 8/30/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> > > > > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock at gmail.com>:
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 V3] osm: QoS - adding QoS policy options
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/30/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> > > > > > > How are the use of flex and bison dealt with in Windows ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are windows ports for these tools. Here are some links:
> > > > > > http://www.mingw.org/MinGWiki/index.php/bison
> > > > > > http://www.mingw.org/MinGWiki/index.php/flex
> > > > >
> > > > > Any license issue with those ?
> > > >
> > > > Why do you ask?
> > >
> > > Because we've run up against this before in a slightly different
> > > context in Windows.
> >
> > Couldn't parse this.
> > Anyway, I don't think there's any license issue here.
> 
> They're GPL rather than LGPL so that should be the case.

So that's the case. No issues as long as you don't violate GPL.

-- 
MST